Tag: Undergraduate

  • UGC To Allow Students To Pursue PhD After 4 Year Undergraduate Course

    UGC To Allow Students To Pursue PhD After 4 Year Undergraduate Course

    University Grants Commission, UGC has recently announced its new regulations and eligibility criteria for students who are seeking PhD Admissions. As per the new guidelines issued by UGC India, students can now pursue a PhD after the completion of their four-year undergraduate degree programme.

    Based on these new regulations, UGC has stated that students who secure a minimum CGPA of 7.5 out of 10 in the four-year undergraduate programme, FYUP would become eligible for PhD Admissions without having to complete a master’s degree course.

    As per a TOI report dated June 14, 2022, the commission is expected to release the University Grants Commission (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of PhD Degree) Regulations 2022 by the end of this month — June. These regulations would most likely come into effect from the new academic session of 2022 to 2023.

    Encouraging four-year undergraduate students with research bent mind to do PhD is important to improve the research ecosystems in our Higher Education Institutes. That is why we are permitting 4-year UG students who have a CGPA of 7.5 and above to be eligible for PhD Admissions,” stated UGC Chairperson M Jagadesh Kumar to TOI.

    The FYUP – the four-year undergraduate programme is an initiative that will be reintroduced in HEI’s as part of the National Education Policy, NEP 2020. As per UGC, the students who achieve a 7.5 CGPA out of 10 at the end of their fourth year (8th semester) will be eligible to apply for PhD Admissions. Students from the SC, ST, OBC, EWS, and PwD sections would be given a relaxation of 0.5 CGPA in order to apply.

    Students must note that in case they have secured a CGPA less than 7.5 out of 10, then one year of a Master’s degree is compulsory for them in order to become eligible for PhD Admissions. The Complete regulations are expected to be released by the commission soon.

    For More Such Articles, News Update, Events, and Many More Click Here

    [block id=”news-promotion”]

  • Delhi University Resumes Offline Exams For Second, Third-Year Undergraduate Students

    Delhi University Resumes Offline Exams For Second, Third-Year Undergraduate Students

    The physical model of examination for second and third-year undergraduate students at Delhi University began on Wednesday after a two-year gap due to the Covid pandemic. Over 29,500 students appeared for the exams for 40 papers held in the morning, D S Rawat, the university’s dean of examination, told PTI. The Delhi University’s School of Open Learning held exams for three papers on Wednesday morning. “The exams for the majority of the courses have begun. This is after two years that the university is holding a physical mode of examination. Proper arrangements have been made,” Mr. Rawat said. The examinations of undergraduate students are being conducted in two sessions in a day, the DU dean of exams said.

    Examinations for 66 papers will be held in the evening and around 23,684 students are expected to appear, he said, adding proper Covid protocols were being followed and students were given an additional 30 minutes for the exam. “The duration of exams of undergraduate, post-graduate, professional programmes is three hours and an additional 30 minutes is being provided as a special one-time measure,” Mr. Rawat added.

    Meanwhile, the duration of exams for persons with benchmark disability (PwBD) is four hours and 40 minutes. It includes an additional 40 minutes as a “special one-time measure” and an extra time of 20 minutes per hour. Though the examination for a majority of the courses began on Wednesday, the university conducted exams for students with Essential Repeats on Monday and Tuesday.

    The Covid pandemic had forced the university to conduct open-book exams as colleges were shut until early this year. The DU has advised students to carry hand sanitizer and water bottles to the examination center and follow Covid guidelines, including wearing masks and maintaining social distancing.

    For More Such Articles, News Update, Events, and Many More Click Here

    [block id=”news-promotion”]

  • UGC Draft Framework Would be Disastrous for Research, Say Academics

    UGC Draft Framework Would be Disastrous for Research, Say Academics

    After much speculation, University Grants Commission (UGC), the regulatory authority for central universities in the country, released its draft curriculum framework for four-year undergraduate programmes and the stakeholders can submit their comments till April 4, 2022. The final framework will be put in place to be taught at educational institutions in accordance with the New Education Policy (NEP).

    The draft framework suggests that the colleges and universities will move away from three-year undergraduate courses to four-year undergraduate programmes with multiple exit points. The students will be awarded with a certificate, diploma, degree, and degree with honors if they successfully complete two semesters, four semesters, six semesters, and eight semesters, respectively.

    The draft document suggests that the universities will offer common and introductory courses in the first three semesters to students in humanities, sciences, and social sciences. At the end of the third semester, the students need to choose two minors and one major in the disciplinary or inter-disciplinary field of study. Students may pursue further research in their major subject. While the framework remains unfinalized, universities like Delhi University and Jawaharlal Nehru University have already given their assent to the four-year undergraduate programme.

    Additionally, students passing four-year undergraduate programmes with CGPA of 7.5 will be eligible for admissions in Ph.D. courses. The draft suggesting amendments to the UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedures for Award of Ph.D. Degree) Regulations, 2016 maintains that 60% of seats will be reserved to students qualifying for the National Eligibility Test/ Junior Research Fellowships (NET/JRF). NET is the qualifying examination for teaching in higher education institutes. The top 10% of those qualifying NET are awarded Junior Research Fellowship to pursue their research interests in each subject specified by the UGC.

    Concerned over many provisions, academicians maintain that the draft framework dilutes the quality of research by doing away with the two-year master’s program. The UGC has already scrapped the M.Phil programme from the current academic session. Now, students would be able to pursue Ph.D. after the four-year bachelor’s programme.

    Abha Dev Habib, a former Executive Council Member, told NewsClick that the new draft framework not only does away with master’s in arts and sciences courses but also dilutes the undergraduate programme itself.

    The vast majority of students in higher education are undergraduates. According to the 2019-20 AISHE report, undergraduates constitute 3.06 crores out of a total of 3.85 crores. The FYUP scheme that is being proposed is going to simplify UG studies for this vast majority. Despite opposition, DU is currently preparing syllabi for an FYUP framework of 176 credits. We are horrified to note that we are not even able to save two-thirds of the course content as the number of hours of study has been reduced as opposed to the current system of three-year Choice Based Credit System of 148 credits. Honours degree will get diluted and teachers will face job loss.

    She said,

    She added that the students are made to spend 1.5 years of academics in learning common modules. It does not serve any purpose, according to her. She said that if the framework suggests that all students need to learn mathematics, the module would replicate the structure of curriculum of class X. Those who have already learned it will find it a frustrating repetition, and those who did not learn it came to universities to pursue other subjects. Why would parents be willing to spend their money on a course structure where much of the subjects have already been taught in schools, she asked. “It is asking teachers to evaluate students on Yoga practices. It is preposterous to say that doing yoga will bring you good marks. The officials fail to understand that it is a specialization that is celebrated across the world, not commons,” Habib said.

    The structure of FYUP suggested by the National Higher Education Qualification Framework (NHEQF) of a 3-years degree of 120 credits and a 4-years degree of 160 credits will cause extreme dilution of degrees for students and job loss for teachers. The idea of spending 3 semesters on modules that will be common to all students is an extremely faulty idea and was one of the major reasons for students to rally against the FYUP model at DU imposed in 2013. After schooling, which ends with intense study of certain subjects of choice only, wasting the time of students in higher education through diluted common modules for all streams diffuses the attention of students. Common modules for all students mean that these will be not even of the level of class XI and XII.

    She added,

    As a result, FYUP means that cost of education and years to earn a full UG degree will go up while there is no gain in learning and engagement with subjects in depth. To allow students to directly enroll in Ph.D. after such an FYUP means a big dilution of higher education. The current three-year UG plus two-year PG is more robust and rigorous than the framework of higher education imposed by NEP 2020,” Habib stated.

    Talking about financial implications, she emphasized, “Where is the money for any expansion of existing infrastructure and capacities to host students for the fourth year? Think about colleges and universities across the country. No government has promised any money. In a country where many more should be brought into the fold of education, any expansion should be about giving admission to more students rather than hosting the same set for a longer period.”

    Rohit, Assistant Professor of Economics at Jawaharlal Nehru University and a core member of the JNU Teachers’ Association, said that doing away with the master’s programme will create a huge void in the sense that the students will have hardly any motivation for research. He said the UGC wants to bring in the American model of education where a student can go for a Ph.D. after qualifying in the GRE test. However, a minuscule population there goes for research where the applicant is rigorously evaluated. In India, the UGC did away with M.Phil because it cited several issues with it. But then students had master’s Subjects where they too could test themselves if they really wanted to pursue higher research, he said. In undergraduate courses, students are taught as per textbook method whereas Ph.D. students look at their field of study critically, Rohit added.

    Speaking to NewsClick, Rohit said,” It will be difficult for both students as well as teachers. They will hardly get any training for research in the undergraduate honours programme. Can you train a passing undergraduate student about writing synopsis and thesis, doing field research, preparing questionnaires, etc. in such a short time? Frankly speaking, we are worried about mass drop-outs in research.”

    The proposed structure is also worrying students over the future course of research. Alok Kumar, who recently passed his M.Phil in Linguistics from JNU, said that the new system is giving them easy options to quit rather than motivating them to engage further. Talking to NewsClick, he said that the students from poor parts of the country would find it difficult to afford their studies in expensive urban campuses. He said, “Doing away master simply means that the student will be entirely dependent on guides for research. Where is his intervention in research? Secondly, the easy option will move away from students from poor states from higher education. How will the issues of these areas will be dealt with? Will a student from urban and plush areas be interested in drinking water scarcity in different parts of the country?

    For More Such Articles, News Update, Events, and Many More Click Here

    [block id=”news-promotion”]

  • UGC Undergraduate Framework 2022: Deadline To Submit Suggestions Ends Today

    UGC Undergraduate Framework 2022: Deadline To Submit Suggestions Ends Today

    UGC Undergraduate Framework 2022: University Grants Commission (UGC) on January 31 released the draft for the National Higher Education Qualification Framework (NHEQF). The draft is available in the public domain and focuses on reforming the Higher education system in India based on the new National Education Policy. The commission is seeking suggestions from the public. Post-closing of the feedback process, a decision regarding the NHEQF 2022 can be expected from the commission.

    It is noted that the framework has been divided into 10 levels. Out of those 10 levels, levels 1 to 4 will focus on school education, whereas levels 5 to 10 will focus on higher education. At every level, the students will be assessed based on parameters, including knowledge and understanding of theory; cognitive and technical skills; application of knowledge and skills; decision-making abilities; constitutional, humanistic, ethical, and moral values; employment-ready skills and the entrepreneurship mindset. The deadline to submit feedback ends on February 13, 2022.

    Steps to view NHEQF draft

    • Visit the official website ugc.ac.in
    • Go to the notice section and click on link which reads UGC Public Notice regarding Inviting Feedback/Suggestions from all stakeholders on draft National Higher Education Qualifications Framework (NHEQF).
    • Post clicking on it, the NHEQF Draft will be opened on the screen.

    UGC Undergraduate Framework 2022: UGC invites suggestions

    • The 72 page draft can be checked by following the steps mentioned above.
    • After viewing the draft, individuals can submit their suggestions at nepnheqf@gmail.com
    • The last date to submit suggestions ends on February 13, 2022.

    It has been felt that given the size of the higher education system and the diversity of institutions and programmes of study in India, the country needs to move towards developing a nationally accepted and internationally comparable and acceptable qualifications framework to facilitate transparency and comparability of higher education qualifications at all levels. The NHEQF is an attempt in this direction,” the draft reads.

    NHEQF fixes credits for research degrees

    Considering the NEP 2020, the draft NHEQF fixes the number of credits that are required to clear the different levels of programs. These programs include four-year undergraduate programme, master’s degrees, and doctoral degrees. It has been mentioned in drafts that students who are looking to exit the undergraduate programme with a certificate will require 40 credits. Students with a diploma after two years will need 80 credits and a degree after three years will have a requirement of 120 credits; degree with honors/research after four years with 160 credits.

    For More Such Articles, News Update, Events, and Many More Click Here

    [block id=”news-promotion”]

  • How DU’s Undergraduate Curriculum Framework Will Help India’s Higher Education Keep up With International Standards

    How DU’s Undergraduate Curriculum Framework Will Help India’s Higher Education Keep up With International Standards

    The highlight of DU’s Undergraduate Curriculum Framework is student centricity. Till now, in the higher education framework, while structuring the curriculum framework, not much attention was given to the special situation or needs of the students

    This statement stands true for the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, prepared under the guidance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, to bring about a change in the education system of the country, unveiled one and a half years ago. It was acclaimed all across, but at the same time, it was also evinced that its implementation would be a huge challenge.

    Fortunately, to turn this great vision document into a reality, in the university’s system, the University of Delhi (DU) has taken a concrete step, when under the leadership and supervision of professor Yogesh Singh, a transformative and far-reaching curriculum framework was devised for the undergraduate stage of higher education; a framework which can be a model for the entire country. This Undergraduate Curriculum Framework (UGCF), to be implemented from the academic year 2020-23, is a student-centric framework and has been designed keeping in mind the employability, research prospects, national interest as well as international standards. But even then, a few people are not convinced.

    The highlight of DU’s Undergraduate Curriculum Framework (UGCF) is student centricity. Till now, in the higher education framework, while structuring the curriculum framework, not much attention was given to the special situation or needs of the students and a straitjacket approach had been the rule. In a country like India, having a diverse social, economic, geographical, and educational background, the students have their own unique situations, needs as well as aptitudes. But barring exceptions, so far, only a limited choice of subjects/ courses in a stream is available to students in all the universities including DU. Now, in the new UGCF of DU, students will get a wide opportunity to study subjects/ courses outside their stream. For example, students of science stream can earn a ‘Major’ in Mathematics or Chemistry along with a ‘Minor’ in Psychology or Economics as their Honours degree.

    This system has been in place for years in all the top international universities. It must be understood that this structure is going to be very beneficial for the emerging multitasking types of jobs as well as in multi-disciplinary research. For some skeptics, this will lead to an erosion of expertise in the stream. Here, it must be emphasized that in the UGCF, the option to take ‘Minor’ from the same stream will also be available. For instance, a ‘Major’ in Physics can be done along with a ‘Minor’ in Mathematics. That is, students will get a variety of options to choose the subjects from, according to their aptitude, interests, and needs; a choice which is very limited currently.

    Another outstanding feature of DU’s UGCF is that for the first time, in the history of independent India, an effort has been made to get rid of the Macaulay model of education in the true sense. It is very obvious that the present framework of undergraduate education is mainly limited to books or classrooms. Students are largely cut off from the real world. The bookish knowledge they acquire is of no or very little use in practical life or for employment. One often comes across the media reports that lakhs of youth having an undergraduate degree or a postgraduate qualification including Ph.D. apply for the post of peon. Not only are these people not well equipped to be absorbed in the emerging new kinds of jobs, but they are also not trained for any self-employment, which is a huge waste of time, money, and energy of the educated youth, and indirectly, resources of the country as well.

    Keeping these issues in consideration and in the spirit of NEP-2020, the new UGCF ensures that DU students, even in the traditional Bachelor programs, will now get a ‘hands-on experience having the opportunity to do an ‘internship’ or ‘apprenticeship’ or ‘project’, etc, for four semesters. An important point to note here is that the marks obtained above will be included in the mark sheets. This new arrangement, influenced by ancient Indian ethos as well as the ideas of Mahatma Gandhi in modern times, will promote both employment as well as self-employment. All top international universities also provide similar kinds of ‘hands-on’ training for their students. Today, a variety of employable skill enhancement courses will be available under UGCF. Currently, various popular professional courses related to computer programming, data handling, web designing, multimedia, etc, are available only as an ‘add-on course’.

    One of the salient objectives of NEP-2020 is the all-around development of students with Indian values. In line with this spirit, perhaps for the first time in Indian education, ‘Value Addition Courses’ like Indian Culture, Ethics, Sports Education, etc, with real-life experience will be mandatory under UGCF. Importantly, their marks will also be added to the mark sheets so that students take them seriously.

    NEP-2020 also envisions establishing India as a future superpower in the field of research and innovation. UGCF is fully conscious of this and students will be exposed to research training from the very first stage of higher education i.e. bachelor level. In the fourth year, they will get an opportunity to write a dissertation, again a practice prevalent in the best universities of the world. The new framework is so flexible and student-friendly that it provides students with the freedom of choice here too. For instance, after one or two years of studies, if a student wishes to pursue a master’s degree or Ph.D. in a ‘Minor’ subject, he/she will have the opportunity to write the dissertation in a ‘Minor’ subject as well.

    The complete undergraduate program, proposed in UGCF, as envisioned by the NEP-2020, will be of four years having provisions for multi-entry and multi-exit points; acquiring certificates and diplomas for each stage if a student leaves midway because of any reason, the facility of transfer of credit from other institutions shall be available, making the process student-friendly.

    So, why is there a controversy over such a good curriculum, prepared meticulously, incorporating suggestions from all the Heads of Departments, college principals, and other stakeholders? One reason for the controversy is purely ideological, which in fact negates the entire NEP-2020 as such. Second, an illusion has been created that this UGCF will lead to layoffs of teachers as some credits will be reduced. However, this is not true. The UGCF proposes 132 credits in three years and 176 credits in four years which is much more than what the UGC’s ‘Guidelines for Multiple Entry and Exit in Academic Programme’ has in place. As per UGC guidelines, while in three years, credit should be in the range of 108 to 120, a four-year degree can have 144 to 160 credits so that students should not be overburdened. All other universities of the country have credit-load as per the UGC guideline. The International standard is even more stringent, having a credit-load range of 96-108 in three years, and 128 –144 credits in four years. But the proposed DU framework has relatively increased the credit-load keeping in mind the interests of the teachers.

    It must be added here that even while comparing with the existing standard, as the options for the Discipline Specific Electives Courses will be much more than what is being offered presently the sections per class related to that subject will also be more, hence the number of teachers required will not decrease. It is also worth mentioning that since there is no reduction in the number of students, there is no possibility, accordingly, of retrenchment of teachers. Rather, the number of teachers will only increase because of an additional year, the fourth year, for which the additional number of teachers will be required for every subject.

    Today, after 75 years of Independence, when we are celebrating the Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav, our undergraduate education, fortunately, is also going to be completely independent in the true sense for the first time setting new records in the interest of the students and the nation. It’s desirable that all the stakeholders related to education must extend their full cooperation in this innovative expedition to revamp higher education. This is what India expects from them

    For More Such Articles, News Update, Events, and Many More Click Here

    [block id=”news-promotion”]