Connect with us
http://www.mvpthemes.com/zoxnews/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/zox-leader.png, http://www.mvpthemes.com/zoxnews/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/zox-leader.png

News

A New Change For NEET 2017

Published

on

Candidates have been fighting to get age limit relaxation for NEET 2017. The Supreme Court of India has said that those candidates who have filed petitions or approached them by March 1 (the last date to submit NEET application), will enjoy the age-limit relaxation benefit.

The Supreme Court is to give its final verdict on the age criteria of National Eligibility-Cum-Entrance-Test (NEET 2017) on March 31 on the several petitions filed, questioning the government’s move as to why it reduced the age limit to 25 for the single common entrance examination to get  admission in medical colleges.

The Oversight Committee on the Medical Council of India, headed by former Chief Justice RM Lodha, recommended that the age cap be scrapped. On March 16, MCI Vice-President Dr. CV Bhirmanandam informed media that they will abide by these recommendations.

“The Oversight Committee was of the opinion that such limitations will curb the birth of doctors in the country. The Union Health Ministry agreed in to the recommendations and forwarded them to us. We have given it the clearance,” Dr. Bhirmandandam said. A similar petition has been filed in the Allahabad High Court.

Supreme Court’s Final Verdict On Age Limit Comes On March 31

Activist Dr Anand Rai, who is a part of the petitioning team, said that there were over 20,000 aspirants above the age of 25 years eagerly awaiting the government’s decision. But only those will enjoy the age relaxation benefit who have filed petitions or approached the Court by March 1 (the last date to submit NEET application), said the Court. He further said that this decision of the Court will be unfair to many as to not all have the capacity to approach the court. And most of the rural students will be upset, said Rai.

Ever since CBSE has announced the age and attempt criteria for NEET in January, medical aspirants are protesting this decision and demanding the rollback of it. While the MCI has mentioned that NEET 2017 be considered as first attempt with the age-limit criteria remaining the same.

 

 

News

DU Professor Writes To PM On “Violation” Of Quota Norms In Teachers’ Appointment In Central Varsities

Published

on

He said the Dalit teachers have not been happy due to lack of implementation of the reservation policies in various central universities.

A Delhi University professor has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi accusing various central universities of violating various reservation norms in appointing Dalit teachers and requested him to look into the matter.

In an open letter to the Prime Minister, Academic Council member Professor Hansraj Suman requested him to ensure that the vacant posts for professors in central varieties are filled up as per the regulations for reservation in appointments of SC/ ST teachers.

He said the Dalit teachers have not been happy due to lack of implementation of the reservation policies in various central universities. He said there are many posts for which there was no reservation policy in place in many varsities, giving the varieties a free hand in the matter, he wrote in the letter.

(SOURCES PTI )

Continue Reading

News

100 Percent Fee Refund On Cancellation Of Admission 15 Days Before Last Date: UGC

Published

on

The University Grants Commission (UGC) prohibited the charging of fees in advance for a year or a semester. It also warned institutes against forcing students to buy the institutions’ prospectus.

UGC has issued the guidelines to be followed for fee refund in case of withdrawal of admission. The rule shall be applicable to undergraduate, postgraduate, and research programs run by universities included under Section 2 (f) of UGC Act, together with all colleges under their affiliating domain and institutions declared as Deemed to be Universities under Section 3 of the UGC Act. The guidelines also cover retention of original certificates by Higher Education Institutes at the time of admission.

The decision about fee-refund was announced by Union HRD Minister Prakash Javadekar during an interaction with media on October 10, 2018.

“Now no student will be required to submit any original academic and personal certificates at the time of submission of admission form and Students’ will get refund of fee from the Institution if they withdraw their admission from the programme,” the minister had said.

The guidelines state that Higher Education Institutes can not make it mandatory for students to purchase institutional prospectus. As per the Right to Information Act 2005, and also reiterated by UGC, all HEIs have to disclose institute related information, i.e. course details, affiliation details, intake capacity etc. on its official website.

HEIs can not charge fees for any semester/year other than the one in which a student is to engage in academic activities.

In case of withdrawal of admission, the following rules will be applicable for refund of fee:

100% fee refund: in case a student decides to withdraw 15 days or more before the formally notified last date of admission. Not more than 5% of the fees paid by the student, subject to a maximum of Rs. 5000, will be deducted as processing charges.

90% fee refund: in case a student decides to withdraw less than 15 days before the formally notified last date of admission.

80% fee refund: in case a student decides to withdraw within 15 days or less after the formally notified last date of admission.

50% fee refund: in case a student decides to withdraw between 16 days and 30 days after the formally notified last date of admission.

NIL: in case a student decides to withdraw after 30 days of the formally notified last date of admission.

HEIs can not ask students to submit original certificates at the time of admission. HEIs shall physically verify the original certificates at the time of admission and return the same immediately. The self-attested certificates of students will be held valid and authentic. In  case, a HEI doubts the authenticity of the certificates they can approach the concerned University or Board which issued the certificate but original certificate can not be retained under any circumstance.

Continue Reading

News

DU’s Political Science Department To Continue With Kancha Ilaiah’s Books

Published

on

The committee had suggested removal of three of books of Ilaiah— Why I am not a Hindu, God as Political Philosopher: Buddha’s Challenge to Brahminism, and Post-Hindu India: A Discourse in Dalit-Bahujan Socio-Spiritual and Scientific Revolution.

Setting aside the recommendations of the standing committee on academic matters, which had suggested removing three books of OBC academician and activist Kancha Ilaiah for being insulting to Hinduism from the postgraduate syllabus, Delhi University’s (DU) Political Science Department have decided to continue with the readings.

The decision was “unanimously” taken in a department meeting held on Thursday. The final decision in the matter, however, will be taken by the Academic Council (AC).

The committee had suggested removal of three of books — Why I am not a Hindu, God as Political Philosopher: Buddha’s Challenge to Brahminism, and Post-Hindu India: A Discourse in Dalit-Bahujan Socio-Spiritual and Scientific Revolution.

“We stand by the past courses we have taught, as we had sent them earlier. The books will also continue to be used. These were very carefully considered readings which were given for these courses, and these are readings which are used all over the country and world. They are part of standing academic discourse, so there’s no question of selectively picking on them,” said associate professor Madhulika Banerjee.

Assistant professor Saroj Giri, who was also a part of the meeting, said no change was accepted which was suggested by the committee. “They had a problem with three courses — Black Radical Traditions, where they objected to the word ‘radical’, Islam; International Relations where they said that the word ‘religion’ should replace the word ‘Islam’; and Political Theology in India, wherein they wanted more Hindu literature. None of these recommendations were accepted,” he said.

“All these decisions were taken purely on academic grounds. The committee, in its formal communication, has not mentioned the reasons for implementing these changes,” said Giri.

Professor N Sukumar, too, said no “academic reasons” were given for the suggestions: “The final decision rests with the AC, but if they do decide to drop these books, I… will approach court.”

Ilaiah said he was thankful to the department for “taking a stand”. “I’m glad the department has taken a democratic stand to protect the pluralist ideas continuing in the university. This will set a trend in universities in the rest of the country, where Hindutva people wanted to make universities one dimensional,” he said.

Hansraj Suman, member of the standing committee and among those who raised objections to Ilaiah’s readings and the use of the word Dalit, said, “I don’t want to comment. The final decision will be taken by the AC.”

Source: (indianexpress)

Continue Reading

Trending